This work is authored by Enrica Ignacchiti, a student from FGV São Paulo

Is it feasible to safeguard the environment while also fostering economic growth? I believe it is indeed achievable. In this blog post, we will explore the possibility of establishing a connection between initiatives and trade agreements and as we delve deeper, we will illustrate how a sustainable future can only be realized by giving precedence to environmental conservation.

Let’s start by diving into an understanding of what green policies entail. Green solutions are critical to halting climate change and lessening its environmental impacts. Enacting environmental legislation to regulate pollution and protect natural resources, encouraging the adoption of sustainable practices, and investing in energy sources like wind or solar power are a few examples of these activities. Furthermore, the introduction of regulations has been associated with improvements in the quality of the air and water, employment possibilities, and technological breakthroughs. These rules are based on a number of legal systems. National environmental laws in various nations or geographical groups, for example, are relevant. Consider the Emissions Trading System of the European Union (EU ETS), a framework that establishes carbon emission limitations and lets businesses to exchange emission permits. Similarly, the Paris Agreement establishes goals for mitigating warming and requires nations to submit Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) outlining their plans, for reducing emissions.

Additionally, it’s crucial to recognize how trade agreements can pose challenges to the future promoted by eco-friendly policies and impede their implementation. Trade deals often restrict countries’ ability to levy tariffs on harmful goods making it difficult to discourage their use. However, there are exceptions within the World Trade Organization (WTO) framework that allow for environmental protection measures. For instance, a country may impose a tariff on imported products with a higher carbon footprint than domestically produced items as long as the tariff is non-discriminatory and proportional to the environmental impact. Nevertheless, some nations exploit these safeguards for their own benefit leading to lengthy dispute resolution processes (as evidenced in cases, like India – Solar Cells (WT/DS456)).In trade agreements, there are provisions known as Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) clauses that allow foreign companies to take legal action against governments over policies they believe harm their investments by potentially deterring the enforcement of stricter environmental rules.

Once we grasp the essence of policies and the challenges posed by trade deals let’s work together to find common ground for a sustainable future. How can we achieve this?

In my view, it is crucial to balance environmental protection with economic growth. This can be achieved through intricate means. One effective approach would be to update trade agreements. For example, existing trade pacts could be revised to include provisions that prioritize sustainability ensuring that trade practices align with environmental goals. This might mean putting in place strict environmental laws and effective enforcement systems. For example, the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) of 2016 between the European Union and Canada has provisions requiring both parties to honour their obligations under environmental accords. While implementing solutions in recent trade deals like CETA is feasible, amending older treaties would require substantial time and effort from multiple countries. It is imperative for nations to foster cooperation, with the aim of harmonizing environmental standards and trade policies. To achieve this goal there is already a platform established by the Committee on Trade and Environment (CTE), within the WTO where nations engage in discussions regarding the connection between trade and the environment and seek ways to ensure that trade liberalization supports environmental conservation efforts. A change in perspective is required to create a future where environmental sustainability and economic progress coexist. It is critical to understand that maintaining the health of the globe is both a requirement for the environment and a precondition for long-term economic growth. It is impossible for the economy to grow in the absence of resources, a stable climate, and a thriving population—all essential components of a healthy ecosystem. For instance, if essential resources are depleted due to practices such as deforestation, future generations will face shortages. Moreover, with the climate changes leading to more frequent extreme weather events, food security, infrastructure stability, and coastal communities could be endangered, resulting in economic setbacks and large-scale displacement.

In conclusion, these two forces can collaborate harmoniously; however, it is our responsibility to shape a future where both a flourishing planet and a thriving economy coexist.